Reports, MRG Multimedia Research Group, Inc. MRG Multimedia Research Group
Home - Multimedia Research Group Reports - Multimedia Research Group Press Releases Investors' Corner About Us - Multimedia Research Gorup MRG Multimedia Research Group in the Media Conferences - Multimedia Research Group Services, Multimedia Research Group Jobs at MRG Multimedia Research Group Order, Multimedia Research Group Contact us: MRG Multimedia Research Group
 
 

 

Global OTT Video Services & Forecast—2008-2012:

Best Practice, ROI, & ISTB Analysis


Published by MRG, Inc.
Author: Mike Galli
Research Director: Gary Schultz
August 2009, 138 pages

Hard Copy Print Edition $2,995 USD
PDF Single-Departmental License $3,495 USD
PDF Corporate-Wide License Contact Rob Smith for Quote
The report is available free as part of MRG's IPTV Tracking Service
California orders please add 9.25% sales tax

To order click here or contact Rob Smith at rsmith@mrgco.com


 

Executive Summary

As video content on the Internet (or OTT/Over-the-Top Video) grows in popularity and also increases in quality, the burning questions become: How can IPTV, Satellite and Cable Service Providers (SPs) benefit from this? How and why will these services play out in North America, Europe, Asia and Rest-of-World Markets? What business models work best for the SP in both the short-term and long-term, and why? What platform works best for consumers in North America, Europe and Asia? How does the OTT service differ from the hybrid service model described in MRG’s earlier report(1)? This report aims to answer these questions or at least to provide the tools necessary to answer them. These answers are especially important in an uncertain economy because Service Providers must find new services that can be deployed quickly, with low cost, and with some predictability about ROI.

 

What is Over-the-Top Video (OTT) Compared with IPTV?

There are many answers to this question. The answers tend to vary depending on what type of company is involved and by its region of operation. One definition relates to how content gets to the TV set, and with what kind of quality. In this report, OTT is a video  service delivered over the unmanaged Internet to the TV set. IPTV, on the other hand, is video distributed (mostly to TV sets) over a managed IP network, complete with QoS (and sometimes, QoE) built in. In this report, OTT service includes at least one STB (called an “ISTB” or Internet STB) and at least one TV, connected to the Internet.

In this report, use of the term “unmanaged” network refers to an unmanaged video network. In this report, therefore, a “managed network” refers to a managed video network such as the configuration described above for IPTV. While OTT video typically is on a “managed IP network” (the Internet), the network has not been controlled by the same video test, measurement and monitoring technology used in IPTV networks.

 

IPTV vs. OTT STBs
Hybrid
IPTV STB
Full Broadcast Service
+ Managed IP (IPTV Video)
(e.g. BT, Verizon)
Used mostly in Europe,
North America and Asia.
Standalone
OTT ISTB
Internet Interface to IP (unmanaged)
(e.g. Apple TV, Roku, VUDU)
Gaining popularity in
North America and Europe.
Hybrid
OTT ISTB

Full Broadcast Service

+ Internet Connection to IP (unmanaged)
(e.g. Netgem)
Starting to appear as an
alternative to hybrid IPTV.
Source: Copyright © 2009 MRG, Inc.

 

In the U.S., a Cable MSO or IPTV Operator looks at OTT as an addressable source of content at a certain price. After all, most consumers don’t really care if content is coming over the Broadband connection or their video connection. Smaller MSOs may look at OTT as a possible way to add VOD using a different, pay-as-you-grow, business model. The “standalone”  or “independent” OTT Video Service Providers look at it as a way to gain entry into the video market and compete with the traditional Operators. In this report, use of the term “standalone” or “independent” refers to an OTT service that is delivered over a Broadband connection without a formal business (shared revenue) arrangement with the host ISP or Operator. ISPs themselves are also looking at OTT as a way to enter the video market. Retailers also are looking at OTT as a way to increase revenues in tough economic times and to extend their brand more fully with consumers.

 

HDTV: Rear Panel Connections Simple OTT/IPTV Installation
Source: Copyright © 2009 MRG, Inc.

 

(1) Hybrid IPTV Set-top Boxes — Global Market Forecast & Strategy Critique: 2009-2012 (June 2009). For more information visit: www.mrgco.com/iptv/hstb09.html

 

This report is part of the IPTV Tracking Service published by the Multimedia Research Group, Inc.



Table of Contents


1 Executive Summary
1.1 What is Over-the-Top Video (OTT) Compared with IPTV?
1.1.1 Hybrid Services Are Becoming Popular in Various Global Regions
1.1.2 Lean Back/Lean Forward?
1.1.3 Mobility and Devices
1.2 Key Findings
   
2 Background on the Video Service Industry
2.1 Business Overview
2.1.1  The Movie Business & "Release Windows"
2.1.2 The TV Business
2.2 Failed OTT Businesses — Why Did They Fail?
2.2.1 Movie Beam (1,800 Subscribers After 4 Years)
2.2.2 Akimbo
2.3 Legal Issues
2.3.1 Net Neutrality
2.3.2 The Fair Use Doctrine
2.3.3 The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
2.3.4 Viacom's Lawsuit Against Google, YouTube (U.S.)
2.3.5 Pro-IP Act of 2007
2.3.6 The Napster, Grokster Decisions
   
3 Architecture Overview
3.1 Wireless and Wireline — Home Networks
3.2 QoS/QoE — How Acquired and Maintained on OTT
3.3 Unicast vs. Multicast
3.4 Downloading, Progressive Downloading and Streaming
3.5 Traditional CDNs, P2P and P4P
3.6 Transcoders — And Why They Are Needed
3.7 Bandwidth (HD vs. SD) — How to Enable HD
3.8 ISTBs/Game Consoles
3.9 PC-centric IPTV Over Managed Networks
3.10 UI/EPG/Middleware — The Value of a Superb UI
3.11 Navigation Devices — Mice, Keyboards, and Remotes
   
4 Business Models for OTT Services — What's in it for the SPs?
4.1 Pure Models – Rent, Buy, Subscription, Ad Sponsored
4.1.1 Rental OTT Models
4.1.2 Purchase OTT Models
4.1.3 Subscription OTT Models
4.1.4 Ad Sponsored OTT Models
4.2 Mixed Source Models
4.2.1 U.S. OTT Services ("Skinny" Basic) Cable/TiVo (SD Only)
4.2.2 France OTT Service
4.2.3 U.K. OTT Service
4.2.4 Plan A: Internet + Over-the-Air (DTT) to the TV
4.2.5 Plan B: Internet + Cable Using TiVo STB to the TV
4.2.6 Plan C: DVD Rental + Internet
4.2.7 Consumer Pricing Overview
4.3 OTT Consumer Service Ratings
4.4 Traditional VOD Content Models — Revenue Splits
4.5 Traditional DVD Business Models
4.6 Break-even Analysis for OTT Service (SP Perspective)
4.6.1 Tier-1 SP Break-even Analysis
4.6.2 Tier-2 Break-even Analysis
4.6.3 Tier-3 Break-even Analysis
4.7 Case Study: Toledo Telephone and VUDU
4.7.1 Conclusion
   
5 Forecasts
5.1 What Do We Know?
5.2 Global Forecasts
5.3 Cable/Satellite/IPTV Operators
5.4 Cinema Theater Business
5.5 DVD Sales — U.S.
5.6 Western Europe DVD Sales
5.7 U.S. Online Video
5.8 Online Video Ad Revenue
5.9 Internet Set-top Box (ISTB) & OTT Service Forecast
5.10 Marriage of OTT, Hybrid & IPTV
   
6 Recommendations and Conclusions for Service Providers
6.1 Ratings for OTT Service
6.2 Paid Versus Free Content
6.3 Importance of Device Types
6.4 General Recommendations
6.5 Recommendations for Cable or IPTV Operators (For Adding OTT Service)
6.6 Recommendations for Internet Service Providers (ISPs and BBSPs)
6.7 Recommendations for Retail Chains
6.8 Conclusion
   
7 Addendum #1
7.1 Company Profiles – Platforms
7.1.1 2Wire
7.1.2 ADB
7.1.3 Amino Communications Ltd.
7.1.4 BigBand Networks, Inc.
7.1.5 Boxee
7.1.6 Brightcove Inc.
7.1.7 Cisco (Scientific-Atlanta)
7.1.8 Entone, Inc.
7.1.9 Irdeto
7.1.10 Jinni
7.1.11 LG Electronics USA, Inc.
7.1.12 Macrovision Solutions Corporation
7.1.13 Mariner Partners Inc.
7.1.14 Motorola, Inc.
7.1.15 Netgem
7.1.16 Rhozet (Harmonic)
7.1.17 Roku, Inc.
7.1.18 Sezmi
7.1.19 Sling Media, Inc.
7.1.20 Verivue
7.2 Company Profiles — OTT Service Providers
7.2.1 Amazon.com, Inc.
7.2.2 Apple Inc.
7.2.3 Blockbuster Inc.
7.2.4 Comcast (Fancast)
7.2.5 Crackle, Inc.
7.2.6 Disney
7.2.7 ESPN 360
7.2.8 BBC (I-Player) (PC Now, Multi-platform Later)
7.2.9 Fetch TV
7.2.10 Google/YouTube
7.2.11 Hulu
7.2.12 Microsoft Corporation
7.2.13 Netflix, Inc. (Online Video Service)
7.2.14 Sonic Solutions (CinemaNow)
7.2.15 Sony (OTT Service)
7.2.16 TiVo Inc.
7.2.17 Veoh Networks, Inc.
7.2.18 VUDU, Inc. (ISTB + Service)
7.2.19 Yahoo! Inc. (Video Service)
7.2.20 ZillionTV (Online Service/ISTB)
7.3 Company Profiles — CDNs (Content Distribution Network)
7.3.1 Abacast, Inc.
7.3.2 Akamai Technologies, Inc.
7.3.3 Limelight Networks, Inc.
7.3.4 IP Vision
7.3.5 mirada plc
   
8 Addendum #2: Test Installations
8.1 Product and Service Reviews
8.2 Testbed Parameters
8.3 Product Section
8.3.1 TiVo HD DVR and TiVo Wireless Adaptor (G)
8.3.2 Roku Player
8.3.3 Sling Media
8.3.4 PC Laptop
8.3.5 Netbook
8.4 Service Review Section
8.4.1 Netflix
8.4.2 CinemaNow
8.4.3 Amazon
8.4.4 TiVo
8.4.5 Test Results
   
9 Addendum #3 Glossary of Terms
   
10 Addendum #4 — Miscellaneous Specifications
10.1 Appendix A: PC to TV Models
10.1.1 Internet + Over-the-Air to the TV
10.1.2 Internet + Cable to the TV Set
10.1.3 Break-even Analysis for the PC Models
10.2 Appendix B: ISTB Specifications
10.3 Appendix C: Internet Survey Demographics
10.4 Appendix D: Break-even (ROI) Analysis Data—Tier-1, 2, 3
10.5 Appendix E: Condensed Break-even Analysis Data
   
11 Index of Companies


Table of Figures

Figure 1-1: HDTV: Rear Panel Connections Simple OTT/IPTV Installation
Figure 2-1: U.S. Revenue in 2008 with Movie Release Windows
Figure 3-1: Zuegma's QoE Diagram for OTT Service
Figure 3-2: Comparison of a Traditional CDN with P2P and P4P
Figure 3-3: Rhozet's Architecture for Webcasting
Figure 3-4: RipCode's System Overview for Transcoding
Figure 3-5: Roku Screen Shot
Figure 3-6: The Roku Remote Control
Figure 3-7: The Hillcrest "Loop" Remote Control
Figure 3-8: The Logitech MX Air
Figure 3-9: The Logitech 1100 Universal Remote Control
Figure 3-10: HDTV: Rear Panel Connections Simple OTT/IPTV Installation
Figure 4-1: The DVD Business Landscape
Figure 5-1: Audience Demographics By Age Groups
Figure 5-2: U.S. DVD Sales for 2008 and 2009 ($USD, Millions)
Figure 5-3: U.S. Domestic Home Video Transactions (Millions)
Figure 5-4: U.S. Online Video Ad Revenue
Figure 5-5: Ad-supported Online TV Revenues
Figure 5-6: Net Advertising Revenues
Figure 5-7: Internet-to-TV CE Devices (ISTBs)(000)
Figure 5-8: Share of Market By Internet-to-TV (ISTB) Device – 2008 to 2012
Figure 5-9: Market Share By Region
Figure 5-10: Revenue Growth By Region: 2008-2012
Figure 5-11: ISTB Evolution — Assumptions From Driving ISTB Forecast
Figure 6-1 Ratings for OTT Services (Phone Survey)
Figure 6-2: Viewing Habits of Internet Viewers (Internet Survey)
Figure 6-3: Ratings of Paid Versus Ad Based Content
Figure 6-4: Ratings of OTT Devices By Type (Phone Survey)
Figure 6-5: Usage of Device Types (Internet Survey)
Figure 7-1: 2Wire's MediaPortal Software Interface
Figure 7-2: 2Wire's MediaPoint ISTB
Figure 7-3: The ADB "Set-Back Box"
Figure 7-4: The ADB "Set-Back Box" Installed
Figure 7-5: Screen Shot of Mariner's frostt Product
Figure 7-6: Mariner's HomeVu Product
Figure 7-7: The Netgem ISTB
Figure 7-8: The Roku Player ISTB
Figure 7-9: Sling's SlingCatcher Product
Figure 7-10: The Apple TV User Interface
Figure 7-11: Blockbuster's Ad with 2Wire's MediaPoint ISTB
Figure 7-12: YouTube's XL Interface
Figure 7-13: Sony PS3 with Screen Shot
Figure 7-14: The VUDU XL Product
Figure 10-1: Internet Survey Age Demographics



Table of Tables

Table 1-1: IPTV vs. OTT STBs
Table 3-1: Comparison of IP Delivery Techniques
Table 4-1: Basic Cable/TiVo (Monthly, $USD)
Table 4-2: France OTT — One Movie + DTT ($USD)
Table 4-3: U.K. OTT — One Movie + DTT ($USD)
Table 4-4: Comparison of OTT Services in the U.S., France and the U.K. ($USD)
Table 4-5: OTT Consumer Mixed Source Model Comparisons (Per Month Payment, USD)
Table 4-6: OTT Consumer Service Ratings
Table 4-7: Tier-1 Break-even Analysis ($USD)
Table 4-8: Tier-2 Break-even Analysis ($USD)
Table 4-9: Tier-3 Break-even Analysis ($USD)
Table 5-1: Global Active Digital Media Universe
Table 5-2: U.S. Cable, Satellite and IPTV Operators
Table 5-3: DIRECTV's Business Overview ($USD)
Table 5-4: DISH Network's Business Overview ($USD)
Table 5-5: Sky's Business Overview ($USD), Subs Are Millions
Table 5-6: U.S. Cinema Theater Revenue, Admissions and Ticket Prices ($USD, Billions)
Table 5-7: U.K. Cinema Theater Revenue, Admissions and Ticket Prices (£'s and $USD, Millions)
Table 5-8: Western Europe DVD/BD Sales By Percentage
Table 5-9: Western Europe DVD/BD Revenue ($USD, Millions)
Table 5-10: Top U.S. Online Video Properties By Unique Viewers
Table 5-11: Global OTT/ISTB Forecast (Thousands): Installed Base (ISTB vs. PC Devices)
Table 5-12: OTT Video Service Revenues: Global ($USD)
Table 5-13: Regional Share of OTT ISTB Market (%)
Table 5-14: Regional Share of OTT Service Revenue ($M USD)
Table 10-1: Tier-1 Break-even Analysis ($USD) (PC-to-TV)
Table 10-2: Tier-2 Break-even Analysis ($USD) (PC-to-TV)
Table 10-3: Tier-3 Break-even Analysis ($USD) (PC-to-TV)
Table 10-4: ISTB + STB + DVD/Blu-ray General Specifications
Table 10-5: Internet Survey Respondents By Region
Table 10-6: Input Data for ROI Analysis ($USD) (Section 4.6 Above)
Table 10-7: Condensed ROI (Break-even) Analysis for Added OTT Video Service ($USD)

 

Index of Companies

2Wire Macrovision Solutions Corporation
(All Media Guide Holdings, Inc. (AMG), Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), Gemstar-TV Guide)
A&E Television Networks Magna
Abacast, Inc. Mariner Partners Inc.
ABC
(Disney-ABC Domestic Television)
McDonald's
ADB Group Media Week
Adobe Systems Incorporated Mediacom
Advanced Digital Broadcast (ADB) Metacafe
Akamai Technologies, Inc. MGM
Akimbo Microsoft
(Media Center, MSN, Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox Live Gold)
Amazon.com, Inc. mirada plc
American Express MoCA
Amino Communications Ltd. Morgan Stanley
Amino Technologies PLC Motorola, Inc.
AOL Movie Beam
Apple Inc.
(Apple TV, iPhone, iPod, iTouch, iTunes,
Mac, OSX)
Movielink
Archos MTV Networks
ARRIS MySpace
Ascent Media Nagravision
AssetHouse Napster
ASUS NASDAQ
AT&T
(AT&T Broadband)
National Geographic
Audi NBC
(NBC Universal)
BBC
(BBC Worldwide, iPlayer)
Netflix, Inc.
Bell Canada Netgear
Best Buy Netgem
BigBand Networks Inc. News Corp.
BitTorrent Nielsen
Blockbuster Inc. Nintento
(Wii)
Boxee Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT)
Bright House Networks Nissan
Brightcove Inc. ON2
British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB) P4PWG
BT Panasonic
Buena Vista Television Paramount
(Paramount Pictures)
Cablevision PBS
Canoe TV – Quebecor Proctor & Gamble
CBS
(CBS Interactive)
Providence Equity Partners
Channel 4 RealNetworks, Inc.
Charter Communications Rentrak
Chili's RipCode
Chunghwa Telecom Rogers Sportnet
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(Linksys)
Roku, Inc.
Cloakware Roxio
Comcast
(Fancast)
Samsung
Comedy Central SecureMedia
comScore Video Metrix Sezmi
Consumer Electronics Association Shelter Capital
Cox Communications Showtime Networks
Crackle, Inc. Sigma Designs
C-SPAN SingTel
Deutsche Telekom Sky Italia
DIRECTV
(Sky Brazil, Sky Mexico)
Sling Media, Inc.
Discovery Channel Sonic Solutions
(CinemaNow)
Discovery Networks Germany Sony
(Bravia, PS3, PSP, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Music, Sony Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Sony Pictures Entertainment Company, Sony Pictures Television, Sony Pictures Television International)
DISH Network Spark Capital
Disney
(Disney Interactive Media Group, Disney Interactive Studios, Disney Online, Disney-ABC Domestic Television, The Walt Disney Studios)
Startz
(Starz Entertainment, Starz Play)
DLNA State Farm
DreamWorks Studio Hamburg
E! Entertainment Swissinfo/SRI, Technicolor
Edgeware Technologies, Inc.
EMBARQ Telchemy
Entone, Inc. Telekom Austria
ESPN
(ESPN 360)
Televisa
Facebook Telmex
Fetch TV Telstra
Firefly3 LLC The Digital Entertainment Group
Flickr The Weather Channel
FNAC Time Warner Cable
Fox
(20th Century Fox, 20th Century Fox Television, Fox Entertainment Group, Fox Interactive, Fox Interactive Media)
Time Warner Inc.
Fujisoft TiVo Inc.
Fujitsu Tokyo Broadcasting System
FutureSource Consulting Toledo Telecom
Glowria Toledo Telenet
GM Toledo Telephone Company
Goldman Sachs Tomante Company
Google Turner
(Turner Network, Turner Sports, Turner Studios)
Grokster Twitter
Harmonic Inc.
(Rhozet Corporation)
U.S. Department of Defense
HBO UKTV
HD Net Unilever
Hillcrest Labs Universal Music
Home Media Market Universal Music Corporation
HomePNA Veoh Networks, Inc.
HP Verimatrix
Hulu Verivue
IMDb Verizon
Intel
(Intel Capital)
Viacom
(Viacom Digital)
Inuk Networks
(Move Networks)
Virgin Media
IP Vision Visa
Irdeto Vongo
ITV VUDU, Inc.
Jinni Wal-Mart
Johnson & Johnson Warner Bros.
(Warner Bros. Entertainment, Warner Music)
Keirsey Research Weather Channel
LG
(LG Electronics USA, Inc.)
Widevine
Lifetime Networks WSJ
Limelight Networks, Inc. Yahoo!
Lingo YouTube
Linux Zeugma Systems
Lions Gate
(Lions Gate Entertainment)
Zillion TV
Logitech  


 

Global OTT Video Services & Forecast—2008-2012: Best Practice, ROI, & ISTB Analysis (August 2009) is 138 pages and is available in a printed English language edition for $2,995 USD, a PDF single-departmental license for $3,495 USD, and is available free as part of MRG's IPTV Tracking Service. For more information or to order the report, contact Rob Smith at 1-408-453-5553 or rsmith@mrgco.com.

Press Release
Order Form

top

 
 


Home
| Reports | Press Releases | Investors' Corner | About Us | MRG in the Media | Conferences | Services | Jobs@MRG | Order Form